Back to topics

Can a disclosure be ethically defensible even when the law prohibits it?

A fictional employee believes the public needs to know about serious wrongdoing, but disclosure is legally restricted. The ethical question concerns the harm prevented, the harm caused, and the alternatives available. A legal accusation is a different kind of judgment; the U.S. government’s 2013 charges against Edward Snowden illustrate why an allegation should not be confused with a verdict.

3–7 min

Questions you could explore

  • What would make disclosure proportionate to the wrongdoing?
  • Could a less harmful route achieve the same public benefit?

Start reading

Ready to try your ideas aloud?

Your topic carries over. Record up to 2½ minutes, depending on your plan.

Ethics and philosophy

Deduction and induction make different kinds of claim

Deduction asks what must follow from stated premises, while induction uses observations to suggest what may happen next. A valid deduction still needs true premises for a true conclusion; further observations can overturn an inductive generalization.

3–5 min

Deduction and induction make different kinds of claim

Ethics and philosophy3–5 minDeduction asks what must follow from stated premises, while induction uses observations to suggest what may happen next. A valid deduction still needs true premises for a true conclusion; further observations can overturn an inductive generalization.

Ethics and philosophy

Why does the trolley problem change when you change how someone is saved?

A runaway trolley threatens five people. Redirecting it onto a track with one person and pushing someone into its path can produce different moral reactions, even when the numbers match. Explore how intention, duties, and using a person as a means influence the judgment.

3–7 min

Why does the trolley problem change when you change how someone is saved?

Ethics and philosophy3–7 minA runaway trolley threatens five people. Redirecting it onto a track with one person and pushing someone into its path can produce different moral reactions, even when the numbers match. Explore how intention, duties, and using a person as a means influence the judgment.

Ethics and philosophy

Is the red you see the same red that I see?

We can agree that a tomato is red and choose the same matching paint. Does that agreement show that red feels the same to each of us? The puzzle separates what we can compare publicly from what another person’s experience is like.

4–6 min

Is the red you see the same red that I see?

Ethics and philosophy4–6 minWe can agree that a tomato is red and choose the same matching paint. Does that agreement show that red feels the same to each of us? The puzzle separates what we can compare publicly from what another person’s experience is like.

Can a disclosure be ethically defensible even when the law prohibits it? | Speech Topic | speaking.app