Back to topics

Dividing a cake when the two people value different parts

Equal-sized slices need not feel equally valuable. In the two-person cut-and-choose procedure, one person divides the cake into pieces they value equally, and the other selects a preferred piece. Fairness is assessed through each person’s own preferences.

3–7 min

Questions you could explore

  • Why does the chooser’s preferred piece have to be worth at least half of the whole to that chooser?
  • Which assumptions would fail if an important part could not be divided?

Start reading

Ready to try your ideas aloud?

Your topic carries over. Record up to 2½ minutes, depending on your plan.

Maths and statistics

When one long wait changes the average

An average wait can sound straightforward until one person waits much longer than everyone else. The mean and median offer two ways to summarize that same group. Their different responses to an unusually large value raise a practical question: what do we want an average to tell us?

5–7 min
Maths and statistics

How is random sampling different from random assignment?

A study can choose people at random, assign them to groups at random, do both, or do neither. Those choices answer different problems: who the findings may describe, and how fairly the study compares conditions.

3–5 min
Maths and statistics

The leap years the Gregorian calendar skips

Most people learn that a leap year happens every four years, yet the year 1900 had no February 29 while the year 2000 did. Because Earth's orbit takes slightly less than 365.25 days, the Gregorian calendar skips three leap years every four centuries to keep the calendar aligned with the seasons.

2–3 min
Dividing a cake when the two people value different parts | Speech Topic | speaking.app