Clothing lice as indirect evidence of early clothes
Furs, plant fibers, and animal skins rot away quickly in the ground, which means archaeologists rarely find direct scraps of the earliest human clothing. A clever indirect clue survives in parasites: because head lice live in hair while body lice evolved specifically to cling to fabric seams, dating when the head- and clothing-louse lineages split genetically helps estimate when humans started wearing clothes regularly.
Questions you could explore
- Which assumptions turn a genetic divergence into a clue about human behavior?
- How do uncertainty in the genetic clock and uncertainty in the behavioral interpretation differ?
Start reading
- Toups and colleagues / Molecular Biology and EvolutionOrigin of clothing lice indicates early clothing use by anatomically modern humans in Africa
The study’s abstract explains the genetic estimate and its uncertainty. It dates a lineage split associated with clothing use, not the sewing of the first garment.
Ready to try your ideas aloud?
Your topic carries over. Record up to 2½ minutes, depending on your plan.