Back to topics

Repetition can make a claim familiar without making it true

Hearing a claim again can make it feel familiar without adding evidence that it is true. Experiments on the illusory truth effect test whether repetition raises truth ratings, including when people have relevant knowledge. Explore how researchers separate familiarity, knowledge, and judgments of accuracy.

3–5 min

Questions you could explore

  • How would you separate familiarity with a claim from evidence that it is correct?
  • How could a study test repeated statements while accounting for a person's existing knowledge?

Start reading

Ready to try your ideas aloud?

Your topic carries over. Record up to 2½ minutes, depending on your plan.

Psychology

Can an option nobody wants change what people choose?

Choosing between two offers can feel different when a third appears beside them. A decoy is less attractive than one option on the relevant features, but its presence does not reliably change every decision.

5–7 min
Psychology

When a question reshapes a memory

After a car crash or a crime, the way an investigator phrases a single question can change what a witness remembers seeing. Research on eyewitness reports separates what someone originally observed from information introduced afterward, making question wording a crucial part of the evidence problem.

3–7 min
Repetition can make a claim familiar without making it true | Speech Topic | speaking.app